Iams Cruelty return to peta.org
HOME Why Iams? FAQ Campaign Updates Get Active Donate Now Brands Not Tested on Animals
Search
 
Boycott Iams
Join PETA's Activist Network
See Demo Photos
Return Iams Products
Send Iams a Special Delivery
Talk to Your Local Shelter
More Ways to Help
Become a Member
Ads/PSAs
Brands Not Tested on Animals
Literature
Merchandise
Other Companion
Animal Food Issues
Video Video
Photos
ES CZ CR HUN SL SK
Iams Kid's Corner

Other "Pet Food" Companies: Contracting With Killers

Becton Dickinson

Becton Dickinson hired the facility in question to conduct experiments on pigs.

On Wednesday, January 15, 2003, a veterinary technician reported that personnel from the laboratory and employees of Becton Dickinson (BD) revived a pig whose heart had stopped during the course of an unspecified procedure. The pig was then placed back into her cage where she was left to thrash in pain and distress.

Laboratory employee #1: I just want to euthanize her.

Laboratory employee #2: Is this the pig that almost died?

Laboratory employee #1: It died, and we brought it back to life, and [name of the laboratory president] thinks that she actually had a heart attack or her catheter moved or something.

Laboratory employee #2: I mean, she’s trying to get up, and she can’t.

Laboratory employee #1: Yeah, I have to keep her sternal as much as possible [unintelligible], she builds up fluid in her lungs.

Laboratory employee #2: I can’t imagine that that would be good for the study. Do you know what I mean? To have a pig be in that condition?

Laboratory employee #1: I don’t think she is going to make it through the night, obviously, and I have to leave it [unintelligible], too … I just feel awful … poor little thing. I wish she’d just die.

Laboratory employee #2: Yeah.

Laboratory employee #1: I feel like she’s suffering 'cause her eyes are all crazy.

Laboratory employee #2: I know.

Laboratory employee #1: She was out for about three hours [unintelligible]. We had her on oxygen, her heart was going, and I mean, we totally brought this kid back from dead. There was nothing, but I wish we wouldn’t have.

Laboratory employee #2: I can see blood in her mouth, too.

Laboratory employee #1: You can what?

Laboratory employee #2: See a little bit of blood?

Laboratory employee #1: Yeah, [unintelligible].

Laboratory employee #2: And [name of laboratory director] just said to leave her sternal?

Laboratory employee #1: [unintelligible] I have to keep flipping her.
On Thursday, January 16, 2003, the same veterinary technician reported that the pig was still alive and in distress and that she had received permission to kill the pig at the end of the day “if she wasn’t any better.” According to an e-mail message written by the president of the laboratory on this date, BD researcher Fred Harvey (who was at the facility on January 15 and reportedly saw the condition that the pig was in) agreed with this course of action. Needless to say, the pig’s condition did not improve, and as a result, she was finally put out of her misery on the night of January 16, 2003. Section 2.31(d)(v) of the federal Animal Welfare Act (AWA) states, “Animals that would otherwise experience severe or chronic pain or distress that cannot be relieved will be painlessly euthanized at the end of the procedure, or if appropriate, during the procedure.” The pig, as seen in the videotaped footage, was clearly in “severe or chronic pain or distress,” yet the director of the laboratory and BD’s Mr. Harvey apparently allowed her to suffer for more than 24 hours, in violation of the AWA and the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, which states, “Euthanasia might be necessary at the end of a protocol or as a means to relieve pain or distress that cannot be alleviated by analgesics, sedatives, or other treatments.” Not only was the pig not immediately euthanized as she should have been, she wasn’t even afforded the benefit of “analgesics, sedatives, or [any] other treatments.”

On May 16, 2003, BD asked the contract laboratory for an explanation, but although one of BD’s own employees was apparently involved in making the decision that allowed this pig to suffer, this was the last that we heard from BD.

Please demand that BD provide an explanation as to why this pig was allowed to suffer:
Edward J. Ludwig
Chair, President, and CEO
Becton Dickinson
1 Becton Dr.
Franklin Lakes, NJ 07417
201-847-6800
Edward_Ludwig@bd.com
<< Return to complete list.

Click here for a list of dog and cat food companies that don’t test on animals.

Click here to help dogs in Menu Foods labs and the other ‘Met’ dogs by making a life-saving donation today!




More Information
Menu Foods
Introduction
Dog and Cat Foods Supplied by Menu Foods
View the Photos
Watch the Video
What You Can Do
Other Food Companies
Introduction
View the Photos
Watch the Video
Support Companies That Don't Test on Animals
Related Web Sites
StopAnimalTests.com
CaringConsumer.com
AnimalSavingsClub.com
News Release
P&G Shareholders Confronted With Images of Abused Cats and Dogs
State Supreme Court Decision Hides MSU Animal-Experiment Records From Public
Caged 'Dogs' to Confront P&G Over Iams' Cruel Animal Experiments
 
Print This Page    l    E-Mail This Page    l    Subscribe to E-News    
About PETA    Donate Now    Privacy Policy    Disclaimer    PETA Web Sites   
Click here to return to PETA.org